Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÃÖ±Ù 5³â°£ ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿ø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇ È¯ÀÚ ºÐÆ÷ ¹× Ä¡·á °æÇâ

The Distribution of Patients and Treatment Trends in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Yonsei University Dental Hospital for Last 5 Years

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 41±Ç 2È£ p.134 ~ 144
°­Á¤¹Î, ÀÌÈ¿¼³, ÃÖÇüÁØ, ÃÖº´Àç, ¼ÕÈï±Ô, ÀÌÁ¦È£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­Á¤¹Î ( Kang Chung-Min ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÈ¿¼³ ( Lee Hyo-Seol ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖÇüÁØ ( Choi Hyung-Jun ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖº´Àç ( Choi Byung-Jai ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¼ÕÈï±Ô ( Son Heung-Kyu ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁ¦È£ ( Lee Jae-Ho ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â ȯÀÚºÐÆ÷ ¹× Ä¡·á°æÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇ º¯È­ÇÏ´Â Áø·á ¾ç»óÀ» ¾Ë±â À§ÇØ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2008³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 2012³â 12¿ù±îÁö ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿ø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀüÀÚÀǹ«±â·ÏÀ» ¼öÁýÇÏ°í ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç °á°ú ÃÊÁøȯÀÚ¿Í ºñ¼±Åà Áø·áÀÇ»ç 1Àδç ȯÀÚ ¼ö´Â °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´°í ¿Ü±¹ÀΠȯÀÚ¼ö°¡ ±ÞÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÅȯÀº ¸¸ 0~2¼¼ÀÇ ¿¬·ÉÃþÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, ³»¿ø ÁÖ¼Ò´Â Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½ÄÁõ, ¿Ü»ó, ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼öº¹Ä¡·áÀÇ ºÐÆ÷ °á°ú º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹, ¾Æ¸»°¨ ¼öº¹, Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»ö¼úÀº °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÚ°¡ÁßÇÕÇü ±Û¶ó½º¾ÆÀÌ¿À³ë¸Ó, ¿¹¹æÀû ·¹Áø¼öº¹ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â Ãß¼¼¿´´Ù. ´Ù³»¿ø±Ù°üÄ¡·á°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ°í ´çÀϹ߼ö ±Ù°ü ÃæÀüÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇßÀ¸¸ç, Ä¡¼öº¹Á¶¼ú°ú Ä¡¼öÀý´Ü¼ú°ú °°Àº º¸Á¸Àû Ä¡¼öÄ¡·áÀÇ ºñÀ²ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ȯÀÚÀÇ ºÒ¾ÈÀ» °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇØ ÁøÁ¤¹ýÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¾Æ»êÈ­Áú¼ÒÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÀÌ ÁÖ¸¦ ÀÌ·ç¾ú´Ù. ³»¿ø ȯÀÚÀÇ ºÐÆ÷ ¹× Ư¼ºÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ°í, ÃֽŠġ·á °æÇâÀ» Á¦°øÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ȯÀÚÀÇ ¿ä±¸¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â ÀûÀýÇÑ Ä¡·á°èȹÀ» ¼ö¸³Çϴµ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.

The aim of this study was to investigate changes in treatment patterns within pediatric dentistry departments by analyzing the distribution of patients and treatment trends. To that end, treatment charts based on electronic medical records (EMR) from the Yonsei University Dental Hospital from 2008 to 2012 were collected and analyzed. The results showed a decrease in the number of new patients and patients cared for by non-specialists, while the number of foreign patients has increased. The under 2 years-old group accounted for a large portion of new patients. Dental caries, dental trauma, and malocclusion ranked as the top complaints. In terms of restoration treatment, the proportion of patients receiving composite resin, amalgam, and sealant has decreased, whereas self-curing glass ionomer and preventive resin restoration have increased. Single-visit endodontic treatment has been increasing, with a decreasing trend in multi-visit endodontic treatment. The rate of conservative pulp treatment, such as pulp capping and pulpotomy, has increased. For reducing patient anxiety, treatments under sedation have increased, especially with the use of nitric oxide. This investigation into the latest treatment trends and patient characteristics is expected to help pediatric dentists to make appropriate treatment plans.

Å°¿öµå

ȯÀÚ ºÐÆ÷; Ä¡·á °æÇâ; Áø·á ¾ç»ó; Ä¡·á ºñÀ²; ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú
Patient distribution; Treatment trends; Practice pattern; Treatment ratio; Pediatric dentistry

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI